Lectures/Discussions: 11 a.m. - 12 noon Monday Wednesday Friday Schneider 105
Textbook: Morin, P.J. 1999. Community Ecology. Blackwell.
week 1 |
|
Mon Jan 26 |
overview |
Wed Jan 28 |
communities (chapter 1) |
Fri Jan 30 |
Gleason, H.A. 1926. The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 53: 7-26.
Collins, S., S.M. Glenn, and D.W. Roberts. 1993. The hierarchical continuum concept. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 149-156. |
week 2 |
|
Mon Feb 2 |
Competition: mechanisms, models, and niches (ch. 2) |
Wed Feb 4 |
Wisheu. resource partitioning/shared vs distinct niches
|
Fri Feb 6 |
contributed papers |
week 3 |
|
Mon Feb 9 |
Competition: experiments, observations, and null models (ch. 3) |
Wed Feb 11 |
Brown. ant-rat competition
Weiher. null models.
|
Fri Feb 13 |
contributed papers |
| week 4 |
|
| Mon Feb 16 |
predation: empirical patterns (ch. 4) |
Wed Feb 18 |
Rooney and Waller. deer wolves
|
Fri Feb 20 |
contributed papers |
| week 5 |
|
| Mon Feb 23 |
models of predation (ch. 5) |
Wed Feb 25 |
tba
|
Fri Feb 27 |
quiz 1 |
| week 6 |
|
| Mon Mar 1 |
food webs (ch. 6) |
Wed Mar 3 |
Paine, R.T. 1966. Food web complexity and species diversity. The American Naturalist 100: 65-75 Martinez, N. tba.
|
Fri Mar 5 |
contributed papers |
| week 7 |
|
| Mon Mar 8 |
mutualisms (ch. 7) |
Wed Mar 10 |
Hart et al. Bertness
|
Fri Mar 12 |
contributed papers |
| week 8 |
|
| Mon Mar 15 |
indirect effects (ch. 8) |
Wed Mar 17 |
Carpenter. trophic cascade elk or earthworms
|
Fri Mar 19 |
contributed papers |
| spring break |
|
| week 9 |
|
| Mon Mar 29 |
temporal patterns (ch. 9) |
Wed Mar 31 |
Drake. assembly Tilman. dispersal limitation
|
Fri Apr 2 |
contributed papers |
| week 10 |
|
| Mon Apr 5 |
habitat selection (ch. 10) |
Wed Apr 7 |
tba
|
Fri Apr 9 |
contributed papers |
| week 11 |
|
| Mon Apr 12 |
spatial dynamics and island biogeography (ch. 11) |
Wed Apr 14 |
Hubbell Lomolino. assembly model
|
Fri Apr 16 |
contributed papers |
| week 12 |
|
| Mon Apr 19 |
diversity (ch. 12) |
Wed Apr 21 |
Grace. review Loreau et al. 2001.
|
Fri Apr 23 |
contributed papers |
| week 13 |
|
| Mon Apr 26 |
succession (ch. 13) |
Wed Apr 28 |
drury and nisbet Huston and Smith.
|
Fri Apr 30 |
contributed papers |
| week 14 |
|
| Mon May 3 |
applications (ch. 14) |
Wed May 5 |
tba tba
|
Fri May 7 |
contributed papers |
| week 15 |
|
| Mon May 10 |
debriefing |
Wed May 12 |
quiz 2
|
Fri May 14 |
proposal due |
| Final Exam |
1 p.m. Wednesday May 19: evaluations only |
|
|
requirements |
|
Mondays |
Read the assigned chapter and take careful notes. Come to class prepared to discuss the content. I will randomly call on people -- "What were the main points of the section titled 'x' on pages y-z?" "Does anyone have any question on the section titled 'x'?" "Explain figure 1 on page 9." I will keep track of your participation -- 2 points for a good answer or a good question -- 1 point for any kind of poor answer (such as "I don't know") -- 0 points for absent. I will count the number of points and divide this by two times the number of attempts to yield a percentage participation score for the text book readings. 100 points. |
Wednesdays |
Read the assigned papers and make a detailed outline of both of them. Come to class prepared to discuss the content -- "What were the main points of the section titled 'x' on pages y-z?" "Does anyone have any question on the section titled 'x'?" "Explain figure 1 on page 9." I will keep track of your participation -- 2 points for a good answer or a good question -- 1 point for any kind of poor answer (such as "I don't know") -- 0 points for absent. I will count the number of points and divide this by two times the number of attempts to yield a percentage participation score for the assigned readings. 100 points. |
Fridays |
Find a paper that was either: (1) cited in the chapter, (2) cites a paper that was cited in the chapter (use the science citation index to find these), or (3) is on-topic.
Read the paper and prepare a short, 5-10 minute overview of the paper for class. I will keep track of your presentations on a five point scale -- 5 points for a good presentation -- 4 points for almost good -- 3 points for a fair presentation -- 1 point for "I failed to prepare for class today" -- 0 points for absent. I will count the number of points and divide this by five times the number of attempts to yield a percentage participation score for the contributed papers. 100 points. |
quizes |
There will be a lot of work to prepare for class, so we'll keep the quizes light and relatively easy. Each quiz will be worth 50 points. The quizes will have a few factual questions focused on content and a few conceptual/thinking questions. Good answers will graded as full credit or A, fair answers will be graded as partial credit or B, I don't expect any poor answers, but these will be graded as D or F. |
proposal |
This is a writing assignment worth 100 points. Your proposal will consist of: (1) project summary which will include the goals of your research proposal, (2) review of the state of knowledge which will include numerous key references and a synthesis of the the issues, (3) a project description which will introduce one or more hypotheses you would like to test with a basic description of the methods and experimental design, (4) Potential problems that might arise or would need to be addressed (this allows you to honestly assess your experimental design and admit to holes and possible weaknesses). |
attendance |
Your participation scores are dependent on your attendance. If you are called on and are absent, you will lose points. |
|
 |
|
 |