Measures of Communication W. Robert Sampson University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire
 

HOME

 SCHEDULE

COURSES

RESOURCES

LINKS 

MEASURES

Desire2Learn  
   
Measures
Communication Audits
Communication Climate
Conflict Management
Group & Team Processes
Leadership
Management Communication Style
Mentoring & Coaching
Organizational Culture
Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument
Cameron & Quinn
Organizational Culture Inventory®
Cooke & Lafferty
Organizational Culture Instrument, van de Post,  et al
Organizational Culture Profile, O'Reilly, et al
Organizational Culture Survey,
 Glaser, et al
     
Communication Directions
    
Links 
Computer-Mediated Communication
Conflict Communication
 Group & Team Processes
Human Resource Development
Leadership
Organizational Communication
Organization Development & Theory
 Organizational   Research Methods
Professional Organizations
Qualitative Research Methods
Quantitative Research Methods
Web-Based Learning
Communication Directions
CJ
Department of Communication and Journalism
 
University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire
    
INTERNET SEARCH
 
  csca 
 Central States Communication Association

Measures of Organizational Culture
Organizational Culture Inventory®1
 R. A. Cooke & J. C. Lafferty

   

Reviewed by Julie M. Slowiak

The Organizational Culture Inventory® (OCI; Cooke & Lafferty, 1983) is an instrument designed to evaluate the culture of organizations in terms of behavioral norms and expectations related to the shared beliefs and values held by organizational members.  The OCI measures what individuals and groups within a company regard as expected of them and will be reinforced and rewarded.  It also allows organizational members to consider a culture that, for them, would be ideal for maximizing business performance, and what types of behaviors would be expected of them in that ideal culture.  Therefore, differences between the current and ideal cultures of an organization can be measured by the OCI (Acumen International, 2000).

Structure

The OCI measures 12 sets of normative beliefs and shared behavioral expectations that may influence the thinking and behavior of organizational members, their motivation and performance, and their satisfaction and stress.  Normative beliefs are defined as “cognitions held by an individual regarding others’ expectations for his behavior as a member of a particular group or organization.”  Shared behavioral expectations are “those normative beliefs that are held in common by members of a group or organization” (Cooke & Szumal, 1993).

These 12 sets of normative beliefs and shared behavioral expectations refer to 12 different cultural styles that are placed around a circumplex, with their proximity reflecting their expected degree of association (see Figure 1; Cooke & Rousseau, 1988; Acumen International, 2000; Cooke & Szumal, 2000; Szumal, 2003).  The 12 Styles are2:

Humanistic-Encouraging: Members are expected to be supportive, constructive, and open to influence in their dealings with one another.
Affiliative: Members are expected to be friendly, cooperative, and sensitive to the satisfaction of their work group
Approval: Members are expected to be friendly, cooperative, and sensitive to the satisfaction of their work group.
Conventional: Members are expected to conform, follow the rules and make a good impression.
Dependent: Members are expected to do what they’re told and clear all decisions with superiors
Avoidance: Members are expected to shift responsibilities to others and avoid any possibility of being blamed for a problem.
Oppositional: Members are expected to be critical, oppose the ideas of others, and make safe (but ineffectual) decisions.
Power: Members are expected to take charge, control subordinates, and yield to the demands of superiors.
Competitive: Members are expected to operate in a “win-lose” framework, out-perform others, and work against (rather than with) their peers.
Perfectionistic: Members are expected to appear competent, keep track of everything, and work long hours to attain narrowly-defined objectives.
Achievement: Members are expected to set challenging but realistic goals, establish plans to reach those goals, and pursue them with enthusiasm.
Self-Actualizing: Members are expected to enjoy their work, develop themselves, and take on new and interesting tasks.

The 12 types of norms and expectations are associated with and organized into three general types of cultures (Acumen International, 2000). They are:

Constructive - members are encouraged to interact with people and approach tasks in ways that will help them to meet their higher order satisfaction needs
   Passive-Defensive - members believe that they must interact with people in ways that will not threaten their own security
Aggressive-Defensive - members are expected to approach tasks in forceful ways to protect their status and security 

The OCI can be administered in a group setting or on an individual basis.  There are two versions of the OCI: a computer-scored and hand-scored version.  Both the computer-scored and hand-scored versions have 120 items.  Each of the 12 styles is measured by 10 items describing behaviors that might be expected or required by members of an organization.  The items are ranked on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (“not at all”) to 5 (“to a very great extent”), indicating the level at which the behavior helps people to “fit in” and “meet expectations” in their organization (Cooke & Rousseau, 1988).  Results are plotted on the Human Synergistics® Circumplex (Human Synergistics, 2000), which can show either a person’s individual normative beliefs (when the viewpoint of only one person is plotted) or the shared behavioral expectations that function within the organization (when the viewpoints of different people are combined). 

As stated earlier, the OCI can be used to measure both the current and ideal organizational cultures.  When assessing current culture, the OCI includes items intended to evaluate business outcomes related to the organization’s culture.  Results provide information about the need and direction for cultural change and potential business results that can come from culture change efforts.  By contrast, when assessing ideal culture, the OCI includes items designed to measure the participants’ readiness for moving the current culture toward the ideal.  Results identify possible sources of support as well as resistance to cultural change efforts.  These results will also project further benefits which organizational members feel will result from cultural change.

Strengths and Weaknesses

The OCI has been researched extensively and is continually evaluated to ensure that its assessments are reliable and consistent over time and across raters (Acumen International, 2000).  No recent documentation on the reliability and validity of this instrument was found; however, Cooke and Szumal’s (1993) research tested three types of reliability – internal consistency, interrater, and test-retest – and two types of validity – construct and criterion-related – on data provided by 4,890 respondents from three versions of the OCI.  Cronbach’s alpha coefficients support the internal consistency of each of the 12 scales, ranging from .65 to .95.  Analysis of interrater agreement found that reliability was high across the three forms and variance in responses was explained by organizational membership.  Test-retest reliability was found to show the stability of scale scores over time.  The results of a factor analysis of the construct and criterion-related validities of the OCI showed support across the three forms.

Cooke and Szumal (1993) suggest a possible weakness of the OCI in regard to its discriminant validity.  It has been found that certain scales (i.e., Conventional, Avoidance, Oppositional, Perfectionistic) show dual loadings on one or more forms.  Dual loadings refer to the overlap of a particular style on two of the three general types of culture.  The researchers state that this may be due to a weakness of the OCI, or it could suggest that the norms for the general culture styles are loosely linked in certain settings.

Applications

The OCI is an instrument that can be used in any organizational setting and has many applications.  According to Human Synergistics (2000), the OCI is “the most widely used and thoroughly researched tool for measuring organizational culture in the world.”  The OCI can be used for many things including: identifying areas where change is needed, developing a vision for cultural changes, evaluating the effects of organizational change efforts, and managing diversity and international relations.  Therefore, the OCI is a general instrument that can be tailored to meet the needs o almost any organization.

 
References

Acumen International. (2000). Organizational assessment: Organizational culture inventory. Retrieved October 7, 2002, from http://www.acumen.com/?!=products_oa_oci

Cooke, R. A., & Szumal, J. L. (1993). Measuring normative beliefs and shared behavioral expectations in organizations: The reliability and validity of the organizational culture inventory. Psychological Reports, 72(3), 1299-1330.

Cooke, R.A. & Szumal, J.L. (2000). Using the organizational culture inventory to understand the operating cultures of organizations. In N.M. Ashkanasy, C.P.M. Wilderom, & M.F. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture and climate. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cooke, R. A., & Rousseau, D. M. (1988). Behavioral norms and expectations: A quantitative approach to the assessment of organizational culture. Group & Organization Studies, 13(3), 245-273.
Cooke, R. A., & Lafferty, J. C. (1983). Level V: Organizational Culture Inventory (Form I). Plymouth, MI: Human Synergistics.
Human Synergistics. (2000). Organizational culture inventory (OCI). Retrieved October 7, 2002, from http://www.hscar.com/oci.htm
Szumal, J.L. (2003). Organizational Culture Inventory Interpretation and Development Guide. Plymouth, MI: Human Synergistics International
        

Footnotes

1Organizational Culture Inventory® is a registered trademark of Human Synergistics International, Plymouth, MI USA.  All Rights Reserved.  Used by permission.

2 All OCI style descriptions: Research and Development by Robert A. Cooke, Ph.D. and J. Clayton Lafferty, Ph.D.  Copyright 1973-2007 by Human Synergistics International. Reproduced by permission.

 

  Updated:  July 17, 2007       

CJ 300 --

CJ 307/507 -- Small Group Communication CJ 350/550 -- Human Resource Development C J 450/650--Human Resource Development Seminar CJ 457/657 -- Leadership Development