|
|
|
Measures
of Organizational Culture
Organizational Culture
Inventory®1
R. A. Cooke & J.
C. Lafferty |
|
|
|
Reviewed by
Julie M. Slowiak |
|
The Organizational
Culture Inventory® (OCI; Cooke & Lafferty, 1983) is an instrument
designed to evaluate the culture of organizations in terms of behavioral
norms and expectations related to the shared beliefs and values held by
organizational members. The OCI measures what individuals and groups
within a company regard as expected of them and will be reinforced and
rewarded. It also allows organizational members to consider a culture
that, for them, would be ideal for maximizing business performance, and
what types of behaviors would be expected of them in that ideal
culture. Therefore, differences between the current and ideal cultures
of an organization can be measured by the OCI (Acumen International,
2000). |
|
Structure |
|
The OCI measures 12
sets of normative beliefs and shared behavioral expectations that may
influence the thinking and behavior of organizational members, their
motivation and performance, and their satisfaction and stress.
Normative beliefs are defined as “cognitions held by an individual
regarding others’ expectations for his behavior as a member of a
particular group or organization.” Shared behavioral expectations are
“those normative beliefs that are held in common by members of a group
or organization” (Cooke & Szumal, 1993). |
|
These 12 sets of
normative beliefs and shared behavioral expectations refer to 12
different cultural styles that are placed around a circumplex, with
their proximity reflecting their expected degree of association (see
Figure 1; Cooke & Rousseau, 1988; Acumen International, 2000; Cooke &
Szumal, 2000; Szumal, 2003). The 12 Styles are2: |
|
Humanistic-Encouraging: Members are
expected to be supportive, constructive, and open to influence in
their dealings with one another. |
|
Affiliative:
Members are
expected to be friendly, cooperative, and sensitive to the
satisfaction of their work group |
| Approval:
Members are expected to be friendly,
cooperative, and sensitive to the satisfaction of their work
group. |
|
Conventional: Members are expected to
conform, follow the rules and make a good impression. |
|
Dependent:
Members are
expected to do what they’re told and clear all decisions with
superiors |
| Avoidance:
Members are expected to shift
responsibilities to others and avoid any possibility of being
blamed for a problem. |
|
Oppositional: Members are expected to be
critical, oppose the ideas of others, and make safe (but
ineffectual) decisions. |
| Power:
Members are expected to take charge, control subordinates, and
yield to the demands of superiors. |
|
Competitive: Members are expected to
operate in a “win-lose” framework, out-perform others, and work
against (rather than with) their peers. |
|
Perfectionistic: Members are expected to
appear competent, keep track of everything, and work long hours to
attain narrowly-defined objectives. |
|
Achievement: Members are expected to set
challenging but realistic goals, establish plans to reach those
goals, and pursue them with enthusiasm. |
|
Self-Actualizing: Members are expected
to enjoy their work, develop themselves, and take on new and
interesting tasks. |
|
|
The 12 types of norms and expectations are associated with and organized
into three general types of cultures (Acumen International, 2000). They
are: |
|
Constructive
- members are encouraged to interact with people and approach
tasks in ways that will help them to meet their higher
order satisfaction needs |
|
Passive-Defensive -
members believe that they must interact with people in ways that will not threaten their own security |
|
Aggressive-Defensive
- members are expected to approach tasks in forceful ways to protect their status and security
|
|
|
The OCI can be
administered in a group setting or on an individual basis. There are
two versions of the OCI: a computer-scored and hand-scored version.
Both the computer-scored and hand-scored versions have 120 items. Each
of the 12 styles is measured by 10 items describing behaviors that might
be expected or required by members of an organization. The items are
ranked on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (“not at all”) to 5 (“to
a very great extent”), indicating the level at which the behavior helps
people to “fit in” and “meet expectations” in their organization (Cooke
& Rousseau, 1988). Results are plotted on the Human Synergistics®
Circumplex (Human Synergistics, 2000), which can show either a person’s
individual normative beliefs (when the viewpoint of only one person is
plotted) or the shared behavioral expectations that function within the
organization (when the viewpoints of different people are combined).
|
|
As stated earlier,
the OCI can be used to measure both the current and ideal organizational
cultures. When assessing current culture, the OCI includes items
intended to evaluate business outcomes related to the organization’s
culture. Results provide information about the need and direction for
cultural change and potential business results that can come from
culture change efforts. By contrast, when assessing ideal culture, the
OCI includes items designed to measure the participants’ readiness for
moving the current culture toward the ideal. Results identify possible
sources of support as well as resistance to cultural change efforts.
These results will also project further benefits which organizational
members feel will result from cultural change. |
|
Strengths and Weaknesses |
|
The OCI has been
researched extensively and is continually evaluated to ensure that its
assessments are reliable and consistent over time and across raters
(Acumen International, 2000). No recent documentation on the
reliability and validity of this instrument was found; however, Cooke
and Szumal’s (1993) research tested three types of reliability –
internal consistency, interrater, and test-retest – and two types of
validity – construct and criterion-related – on data provided by 4,890
respondents from three versions of the OCI. Cronbach’s alpha
coefficients support the internal consistency of each of the 12 scales,
ranging from .65 to .95. Analysis of interrater agreement found that
reliability was high across the three forms and variance in responses
was explained by organizational membership. Test-retest reliability was
found to show the stability of scale scores over time. The results of a
factor analysis of the construct and criterion-related validities of the
OCI showed support across the three forms. |
|
Cooke and Szumal
(1993) suggest a possible weakness of the OCI in regard to its
discriminant validity. It has been found that certain scales (i.e.,
Conventional, Avoidance, Oppositional, Perfectionistic) show dual
loadings on one or more forms. Dual loadings refer to the overlap of a
particular style on two of the three general types of culture. The
researchers state that this may be due to a weakness of the OCI, or it
could suggest that the norms for the general culture styles are loosely
linked in certain settings. |
|
Applications |
|
The OCI is an
instrument that can be used in any organizational setting and has many
applications. According to Human Synergistics (2000), the OCI is “the
most widely used and thoroughly researched tool for measuring
organizational culture in the world.” The OCI can be used for many
things including: identifying areas where change is needed, developing a
vision for cultural changes, evaluating the effects of organizational
change efforts, and managing diversity and international relations.
Therefore, the OCI is a general instrument that can be tailored to meet
the needs o almost any organization. |
|
|
|
References |
|
Acumen International.
(2000). Organizational assessment: Organizational culture inventory.
Retrieved October 7, 2002, from http://www.acumen.com/?!=products_oa_oci |
|
Cooke, R. A., & Szumal, J. L. (1993). Measuring normative
beliefs and shared behavioral expectations in organizations: The
reliability and validity of the organizational culture inventory.
Psychological Reports, 72(3), 1299-1330. |
|
Cooke, R.A. & Szumal,
J.L. (2000). Using the organizational culture inventory to understand
the operating cultures of organizations. In N.M. Ashkanasy, C.P.M.
Wilderom, & M.F. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture
and climate. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. |
|
Cooke, R. A., & Rousseau, D. M. (1988). Behavioral norms
and expectations: A quantitative approach to the assessment of
organizational culture. Group & Organization Studies, 13(3),
245-273. |
|
Cooke, R. A., & Lafferty, J. C. (1983). Level V:
Organizational Culture Inventory (Form I). Plymouth, MI: Human
Synergistics.
|
|
Human Synergistics. (2000). Organizational culture
inventory (OCI). Retrieved October 7, 2002, from
http://www.hscar.com/oci.htm
|
|
Szumal, J.L. (2003).
Organizational Culture Inventory
Interpretation and Development Guide. Plymouth, MI: Human
Synergistics International |
|
|
|
Footnotes |
|
1Organizational
Culture Inventory® is a registered trademark of Human
Synergistics International, Plymouth, MI USA. All Rights Reserved.
Used by permission. |
|
2
All OCI style descriptions: Research and Development by Robert A. Cooke,
Ph.D. and J. Clayton Lafferty, Ph.D. Copyright 1973-2007 by Human
Synergistics International. Reproduced by permission.
|
|
|