CJ 307/507 Small Group Communication W. Robert Sampson
 

HOME

 SCHEDULE

COURSES

RESOURCES

LINKS 

MEASURES

Desire2Learn  

   

  
 Spring 2006
Donelson Forsyth, Group Dynamics (4th ed.)
    
Overview
Assignments
Participation
Examinations
Midterm Reports
Final Reports
Calendar
Guides
Teams
Communication Directions
CJ
Department of Communication and Journalism
  
University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire
INTERNET SEARCH
Communication Directions
Academy for Human Resource Development
Academy for
Human Resource Development
     
Academy of Management
Academy of Management
       
American Society for Training and Development
American Society for Training and Development
        
csca
 Central States Communication Association
    
International Communication Association
International Communication Association
   
National Communication Association
National Communication Association
Midterm Reports

Overview

Early in the semester your team must select a social problem or question which it will research throughout the semester.  The social problem, which must be approved by your professor, should focus on a campus or community problem of interest to your team, your classmates, and your professor. 

A list of many of the previous topics covered is available at http://www.uwec.edu/sampsow/307/2006a/PastProjects.htm.

Because you are dealing with a social problem, you will not simply be evaluating objective issues, you will be analyzing the perceptions and group dynamics of the various constituencies.  Please note that the word “research” is underlined in the first paragraph of this section.  Do not offer blind, unchecked assumptions: interview key people and use surveys to gather information about attitudes or concerns.  And be sure to follow the UWEC Institutional Review Board's Research Guidelines

Initial Reports

Although your team will give the classmate frequent progress reports, two will be graded.  The initial progress report (both written and oral) must focus on identification and analysis of the specific problem, basically addressing the first two steps of our problem-solving agenda.
Thus, you should begin with Problem-Definition, identifying the specific problem you will analyze and defining key terms, recognizing the group's limitations so that you can set realistic goals for the semester. 
Your Problem-Analysis should identify the causes of the problem and the reasons why you believe it to be a problem, and discuss the short- and long-term effects.  Be sure to carefully define and explain your goals for this project, identify any potential obstacles to reaching those goals, and outline your plan for reaching your goals, 
  The written report should, of course, meet the Basic Course Expectations for research, team projects, and for written assignments. 
  Your Oral Report to the class should also meet the Basic Course Expectations  for research and team projects.  The presentation should be 20-25 minutes in length and should include PowerPoints.  Please be sure to give me copies of your PowerPoints so that they may be posted on this website..
  Your instructor, student assistant,  and classmates will assess your presentation on a rating sheet; although your instructor has sole responsibility for assigning grades, he will consider student rating sheets--especially comments--before assigning a grade for your team.
  The Oral Report for the Initial Term Project Presentation will be worth a maximum of 48 points; the criteria we will use in assessing your team's presentation are listed below. The presentation and the Question and Answer period should be planned for 30-35 minutes, of which 20-25 minutes should be presentation or lecture-discussion and 5-10 minutes should be Q&A with the class.  Be sure that you have questions to ask the class if the class does not ask you questions.

 Rating Criteria for Midterm Reports on Term Project

 Presentation:
 Interesting Topic and presentation  stimulated and held my interest.
 Clear Developed clear understanding of topic/problem; logical whole.
 Organized Easy to understand, follow, and remember
 Well-researched Important insights from credible resources were cited
 Informative

Developed new insights and understanding

 Important Insights and understandings developed are relevant and important
 Well-Supported/Explained Clear explanation, language, examples

  Application of Problem Solving Agenda:

  Problem Definition Accurately  defined problem, its scope, and key terms
  Problem Analysis Identified nature, causes, key factors of problem
 The Team
  Knowledgeable Knew topic well, effectively defined and analyzed problem
  Dynamic Presenters demonstrated commitment to project and audience
  Team Effectiveness Well-coordinated, effective teamwork evident
   
 
 
     

   

           

Academy for Human Resource Development

Academy of Management

American Society for Training and Development

International Communication Association

National Communication Association

Academy for
Human Resource Development

Academy of Management

American Society for Training and Development

International Communication Association

National Communication Association

 

Updated: January 9, 2005    

                        

CJ 307/507 -- Small Group Communication CJ 350/550 -- Human Resource Development C J 450/650 -- Human Resource Development Seminar CJ 457/657 -- Leadership Development CJ 459 -- Organizational Communication Analysis