SPEECH, NATIONAL COMING OUT DAY RALLY:
OCTOBER 9, 2003
I am proud to talk with you here again this
year on National Coming Out Day as an openly gay
member of the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire faculty
and as faculty advisor for the UWEC Lesbian- Gay-
Bisexual-Transgender- Straight Association. I want to share a few
thoughts with you beginning with a story from my past.
One day very early in the history of the
Lesbian and Gay Graduate Collective at Syracuse University, now
approximately fifteen years ago, a comrade proposed that we each
share our "coming out" stories. We agreed. As
people started to recount their tales of the seemingly always
singular point in time in which they "came out" and from which
point they finally felt fully "free" to be "who they were"
I experienced a steadily increasing sense of unease about what was
happening. When my turn came, I indicated that I would not tell "my coming out
story" because I rejected the way in which we were making sense
of this issue. I proposed we should recognize that "coming out"
is a process, not an instant or event, and one that
continues, of necessity, throughout our lives.
What's more, I contended, for all of its liberating
potential, coming out is by no means, in and of
itself, the solution to our oppression, contrary to what my
comrades' stories tended to suggest. In fact, I
declared, the necessity to come out– and to keep doing so,
again and again– remains a mark of our oppression, as,
after all, straight people almost never need to "come out"
as straight, yet we, in contrast, continually have to
identify, explain, and justify our existence.
Beyond this, I added, to come out only begins to challenge this
oppression, as we need to proceed beyond merely coming out
to challenge heterosexist and homophobic understandings of what
it means to identify one's self as gay, lesbian,
bisexual, or transgender. After all, when we do
“come out,” when we do declare that we are gay,
lesbian, bisexual, or transgender, how are those to
whom we are coming out understanding what we
mean? How do we know that they are not using
the occasion of this revelation to make sense of us
according to reductively stereotypical, and even trivializingly
insulting notions of what it means to be gay,
lesbian, bisexual, or transgender? In
short, when it was my turn to speak at this meeting I urged
my comrades that we ask ourselves as what, precisely,
are we coming out, and, even more important than this, for what are we coming out
when we do come out?
At the same time as I voiced my objection to
what we had been doing up to that point in our meeting, my
comrades well knew I by no means supported staying in, or
returning to, the closet. I was, and long had
been, one of the most widely visibly "out" people in our
group. My point was, rather, that we should
settle neither for an overly simplistic understanding of
what it means to "come out" nor for a romantic idealization
of what the sheer act of "coming out" alone can
achieve. An overemphasis upon coming out as the pivotal strategy, as the
end-all and be-all of what we do to combat heterosexism and
homophobia, can result in two dangerous tendencies for glbt
politics: 1. it can suggest a false homogeneity among
widely different ways of living as gay, lesbian,
bisexual, and transgender (including by implying that there
is one "best" –fully "out" –way to do this), and 2. it can
cause some activists to focus their activism upon blaming
closeted glbt people for their supposed "immoral"
"cowardice" rather than upon targeting the larger social
forces, conditions, and interests that still to this
day make it often extremely difficult to live as a fully
openly gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender
person.
I urge us likewise to be wary about equating
popular TV representations such as we find in Will and Grace, Queer as Folk, Boy Meets Boy, and Queer Eye for the Straight Guy
with genuine liberation for all gay, lesbian,
bisexual, and transgender people. Not only do these
shows represent the lives of only a small, and, for the
most part, highly privileged sector of the glbt population in the
United States today, but also they tend to do so in
ways that are quite often at best shallow and
one-dimensional and at worst patronizing and
demeaning. We should not be satisfied when the most
prominent popular representations of us today provide the virtual
equivalent of the minstrel shows that Blacks put on
in the days prior to the Black Civil Rights Movement to entertain
ignorant and complacent White folks. And we should
remember that many of those minstrel performers were Whites
in “blackface”; we should be wary of endorsing the
notion that our queerity amounts only to a superficial
“queerface” and that this queerface can be put on and taken
off with the same ease as we put on and take off the
clothes we wear each day.
What’s more, even in the wake of the U.S.
Supreme Court decision to abolish all laws against so-called
“homosexual sodomy” this part summer, along with the
arrival of gay marriage in Canada, we still face many
difficult struggles ahead before we achieve full
equality. To begin, we need to overcome the growing
backlash directed against us that currently assumes its most
prominent form in what I call not “defense of
marriage” but rather anti-marriage
and anti-family
legislation. But this is not all. Even if the
law declares us to be equal, the law often only touches upon
small sections of our much larger social existence, leaving
us still subject to the prospect of considerable ongoing
discrimination, prejudice, and even violent
abuse throughout areas of our lives where the law does not
directly apply. And the law also needs to be enforced; too many
social movements in American history have failed to recognize the
need to remain mobilized, to keep up the pressure, in order
to make sure that our governments –local, state, and
federal– enforce the laws they have passed in response to our
demands. Deeds matter more than words; it is much
easier for governments to pay lip-service to glbt equality,
and even to acknowledge this in writing, than it is to act to
make sure it is realized in practice. In
fact, throughout the U.S. today, and certainly across the
globe, real anti-glbt prejudice and discrimination, as well
as violent abuse, continues often significantly unabated,
despite recent movements toward greater visibility of glbt
people and more prominent public discussion of glbt issues
in the mainstream media. Even when subtler and
more indirect than was common in the not-too-distant
past, anti-glbt discrimination and prejudice that prevents
us from leading fully equal lives still subjects us to real
oppression.
I also maintain one additional concern I want to
share with you today. As we strive for greater tolerance
and acceptance, let’s not lose touch with our history as glbt
people and with the unique ways we have lived our lives
together within our glbt communities and cultures.
Let’s not lose our distinct identities as gay, lesbian,
bisexual, and transgender people. Throughout our
history not only have we, as glbt people, struggled to
fight back against oppression and to secure our liberation,
but also we have created rich, complex, and dynamic modes
of relating, as well as codes of ethics and systems of
value, for which we should be proud. At our
best, we have forged alternative communities and cultures
that are more egalitarian
and libertarian, as well
as more respectful and
tolerant of genuine diversity, and more celebratory of social and
cultural as well as sexual and gender freedom, than much of
the “straight” “mainstream.” Let’s not de-gay,
de-lesbian, de-bisexual, or de-transgender ourselves
as we seek equality; to do so would mean re-closeting
ourselves by surrendering our essential identities in order
to be accepted as “virtual straights.” I firmly believe
that we can, and we must, be equal as ourselves. Our
gayness, our lesbianism, our bisexuality, and our
transgenderism represent the greatest gifts we can give, as
gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender
people, to everyone with whom we interact and upon
whom our lives exert impact.
Nonetheless, I do strongly believe that
the individual act of coming out can prove not only personally
enabling but also socially and politically inspiring.
From the moment I first accepted the fact that I was gay I also
accepted the responsibility to strive to be "out" as far and as
wide, in public, as possible, in order to fight the
widespread conviction that being gay is either, on
the one hand, something trivial and inconsequential,
or, on the other hand, something shameful and
embarrassing. I refused to bear the burden of having to
hide, and of struggling to keep a strict division between
private and public, because I recognized how painful such an
existence so often has been and can be for so
many. I was proud of whom I was, as a man who loved
other men, and who refused to conform to the dictates of
heteronormative standards of "proper masculinity." I
was proud of my friends, and my comrades, brave and
beautiful people who struggled to live and love in similar
opposition to narrow and repressive definitions of
"correct" gender identity and sexual behavior. I felt
that, if I could stand up, and stand forth, as one
who was ready, without apology, to identify himself as
gay, even in the face of considerable hostility, that it
might prove helpful to at least a few of those who had to
interact with me as an openly, and proudly, gay person.
So do come out, keep coming out, and keep fighting
to exercise control over how your coming out will be made sense of by
the others to whom you come out. And come out so that you
can proudly and confidently take up your place in the continuously
ongoing struggle for human freedom and equality, uniting your efforts
with those of all your gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender forbears
who have enabled us to be as out as far and as wide as we are
today. Happy National Coming Out Day to all of you ,
including all of our friends and allies who are here joining
us in supporting us and celebrating who we are as
gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender members
of this university community.