Jan Stirm                                                                             Office Hours: MW 11-12, TR 3:15-4

English Renaissance 1500-1603         Office: Hibbard 404; phone 715-836-3016

Fall 2000; MWF 9-9:50 HHH307                                    Email: JStirm@uwec.edu

We’ll start by considering the difficult term “Renaissance” as a way of understanding texts bound by class, gender, and educational limits, and reconsider the term in light of other ways of talking about the period–political (Tudor), religious (reformation), and linguistic (early modern)–seeking to understand how our terminology informs our reading.  We’ll read texts traditionally associated with the English Renaissance, including works by Ascham, Hooker, Spenser, Sidney, and Wyatt, but also texts from competing positions–Locke (Anne, not John), Marlowe, and Foxe–including voices not traditionally identified as belonging to “the Renaissance.”

In addition to the undergraduate requirements, graduate students will write a graduate level research paper and may lead a discussion (especially based on a paper or other reading).

Goals and Philosophy: We read literature for a lot of reasons, and in a lot of ways.  My goals for you in this class are to 1) gain familiarity with and knowledge of a number of Renaissance texts, 2) learn about the historical contexts for those texts and the conditions of their production, 3) foster a basic understanding of the ways academics approach Renaissance and other literature so that you can approach new texts on your own and use what you’ve learned in this class in other classes or elsewhere, and 4) help you gain an understanding of the stakes involved in taking a “Renaissance” class.

Reading and Notes:  We'll be doing a ton of reading; I usually figure about 3 hours of outside work per hour of in-class work, but your time will probably vary.  You must keep up with the reading, attend class regularly and participate in discussions.  You should also plan on seeing me in office hours to discuss your questions and writing assignments.   You should take reading notes for every text we read, and you should read the introductory material for each play.  Try to read where you have ready access to a decent dictionary; when you run across a word you don't know (and which isn't glossed in the text), look it up and write a short definition in the margin next to the word.  As I read, I make short notes about things that interest me, including the page (or line numbers); I usually write down plot bits, moments of repetition, and passages which seem important, as well as things I really just like.  When I finish a scene or act, I write a short summary of the material, including a list of characters with some identifying notes, the plot or argument, and any special action I think is important.  I also make a special point of writing questions I have about the work.   This goes double when I read theory or criticism.

 Students with Disabilities:   The University of Wisconsin‑Eau Claire is committed to providing equal educational opportunity for all students. The students with disabilities on our campus are offered a variety of services to ensure that both facilities and programs are accessible.   For more information, contact Services for Students with Disabilities (715-836-4542).  SSD helps faculty and students arrange appropriate accommodations for test-taking, etc

 

Quizzes: We will have frequent, unannounced, short quizzes, usually during the first day discussing a new text.  The quizzes will be open notes (closed book), so if you’ve read the text and taken notes, you should find them VERY easy. Quizzes may not be made up (if you have a serious illness, we will make special arrangements).

 

STC/BWWP Exercise:

The class will meet on 9/8 in the Library, where we will look at the Short Title Catalogue (STC), computer resources (and then make a visit to the rare book room).

Once we have finished our work, you will be asked to do the following exercise. Results are to be written up and handed in by 9/15.   Your work will be evaluated for its thoughtfulness and completeness.

Exercise:

1.  Choose 4 random pages from the Pollard and Redgrave print edition of the STC and examine the titles.  Categorize the works as best you can: politics, drama, government, religion, domestic, self-help, agriculture, science, medicine, philosophy, poetry.  Compare your list with the texts included in the Norton Anthology.  Think about your list, and draw some conclusions.

2.   Use the Early English Books On Line and do an author search: Each person will choose an author/text from the following list; look at the information, and be sure to look at AT LEAST the first page or two of the text:

Philip Sidney, (Astrophil and Stella)

Christopher Marlowe (Edward II)

Thomas Wyatt (Psalms)

Robert Greene (Discovery of Cozenage)

Walter Raleigh (Guiana)

Everyone should ALSO look at this text:

John Skelton (Elynour Rummin aka The tunning of Elinor Rumming)

1. Use the author/title/subject search for this text, and write down all information about title, date, place of publication for each edition.

2. Write your observations about the centrality/marginality of this work to the author's other publications.

3. Subject Search: Each person will choose a subject from the following list: Elizabeth I, courtesy, education, anatomy, marriage, America, death, sermons (or choose your own, with my permission).

Look up your subject in the author/title/subject search and pick five interesting works on your subject: write down the full information.   Comment briefly on what you can tell about your subject just from the titles, authors, and dates of the works.

4.  Use the Brown Women Writers Project site to look up one of the following texts.

Jane Anger Her Protection for Women, 1589

The First Examination of Anne Askew, 1546

An Apology or Answer in Defence of the Church of England, 1564

               Bacon, Ann (Cooke), trans. (from John Jewel)

The Tilbury speech (Aske's version), 1588

               Elizabeth I

The Doleful Lay of the Fair Clorinda, 1595

               Sidney, Mary, Countess of Pembroke

Glance through the text and comment briefly about it.  You might want to compare this project’s appearance with that of the EEBOL resources.  Think about which resources will be useful for different projects.

Due 9/14

Book Review:  Choose a book from the course calendar and write a well-considered, fair review of it.  You will find it very helpful to read the book more than once, and to look at book reviews in Shakespeare Quarterly or Studies in English Literature in order to have models for your work.  

The due date for this assignment will vary according to the book you choose.  This means that you can choose your book based on your interests or in order to make your schedule as workable as possible.  (I have copies of many of these books which you may borrow–so long as you promise to return it in good condition.  If you borrow a book from me, you must return it to me when you turn in your review.)

One of the goals for this assignment is that you become familiar with reading academic writing (in part so you can use it as a model for your own writing).  In addition, reading the reviews of your peers will help you get ideas about books which might be useful in writing your research paper (see below).  As you write your review, keep in mind that one goal is to communicate with your peers about how this book may be useful for them.  I will hand out copies of your review to the class asap after I receive it.

Research Essay:  I expect a 12-15 page paper on a topic related to one of the works we’ve read this term.  Your paper should have an argument with a strong thesis, well-supported by evidence from the work (in the form of quotations!).  As far as your essay’s format, I expect standard, one-inch margins, a readable and reasonably-sized font (10 or 12 pitch); please do not use a cover sheet or folder.  Instead, put the title of your essay on the top of the first page, drop a few lines and start in.  Put your name and the date on the back of the last page and simply staple all your pages together at the upper left corner.

You should do outside reading as part of your preparation for writing this paper; if so, you should read at least recent 3 articles (or books) by different critics or theorists or historians (by recent, I mean published within the last 15 years--NOT republished within the last 15 years).  You may find it useful to look at older materials, but should be cautious in adopting their assumptions.  Please also remember that the fact that something is in print does not mean that it is “right” or smart or whatever! 

 

Please come discuss your research ideas as early as you can.  As a rule, the best ideas come from questions you have about the readings, so be sure to write down your questions as you’re reading. 

 Process Assignments for the Research Essay: 

Abstract: An abstract is a short (up to 150 words) statement of your essay’s basic argument.  I will hand out a sample abstract.  Plan to meet with me at least a week before the due date to discuss your project.

Due: November 13

 

Annotated Bibliography: An annotated bibliography is a bibliography of the works you plan to use in your essay.  In addition to each entry, you provide a sentence or two outlining/summarizing the work’s argument or point, and explaining how it relates to (or differs from) your own argument or point.

Due: November 22

Draft Meeting: Based on your abstracts, I will divide you into small groups.  Each group will be responsible for exchanging drafts and meeting with me to discuss your drafts.  You need to pre-circulate your drafts–providing a copy for me as well–at least 1 week before your meeting, and come to the meeting having read each group member’s draft carefully, and prepared to provide a full response to the thesis and argument.  (You will want to explain where you find things confusing or unfinished, make suggestions for the argument, and so forth).  After our meeting, you will have time to revise your essay and to meet with me or your group again.

See syllabus for dates (starting November 30)

Final draft due: 12/14 - Thursday

Some basic information about formats, using quotations, and citations.

MLA format: I prefer parenthetical citation and will give you examples of that format; please refer to the MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers for other possibilities.

Example:  When Lear tells Regan to “reason not the need!  Our basest beggars / Are in the poorest thing superfluous,” he argues that human desire is based less on need than on the possibility of using a resource (King Lear 2.4.264-5).

 Notes:

1) Embed quotations into the context of your sentences so that your reader will have a sense of both the situation in the work AND of how the quotation works as evidence in your argument.

2) Show verse lineation by using a slash (/) between lines and capitalizing the first word of the next line.  If you have quotations of 3+ lines, you will want to set the quotation off by using a margin change (in which case you reproduce the verse as it looks on the page, starting your left margin with two tabs, or, in WordPerfect 6.0+ you can use the F7 key.  For prose, you need to set off the whole quotation two steps in from the left; in WordPerfect 6.0+, you can do this easily with the F7 key, which you use at the beginning of the first line of a paragraph to indent the whole paragraph).  You need not change the right margin.  

3) The first time I quote from the play, I give the title.  If it will be clear to my reader that I am quoting from the same play (either through context, the fact that your paper only talks about one play, or whatever), then I wouldn’t need to give the title every time, but would only give Act, scene and line numbers.  If my readers will know what scene I’m quoting from, I can give only line numbers.  Make sure that your reader will be able to find the quotation easily.  

4) See that my comma went INSIDE the quotation marks.  The period goes outside the last parenthesis.  The general rule for punctuating around quotation marks in the US is: Periods and commas go inside; semi-colons go outside.  Exclamation and question marks go inside if they are part of the quotation, and outside if they are part of your sentence.

 MLA citation format: 

1) An edition of a play:  Shakespeare, William.  Titus Andronicus.  Ed. Nicholas Brooke.  New York: Oxford UP, 1990.

[Give: Author’s Name (if known).  Title.  Ed. Editor’s Name.  Place of Publication: Press (UP=University Press), Year of Publication.]

 2) An article in a journal: Werstine, Paul.  “Narratives about Printed Shakespeare Texts: ‘Foul Papers’ and ‘Bad Quartos.’” Shakespeare Quarterly 41 (1990): 65-86. [Give: Author’s Name.  “Essay Title.”  Journal Title Volume (Year): Page Numbers.]

3) An article in an anthology: Amussen, Susan D.  “Gender, Family, and the Social Order, 1560-1725.”  Order and Disorder in Early Modern England.  Ed. Anthony Fletcher and John Stevenson.  Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1985.  196-217. [Give: Author’s Name.  “Essay Title.”  Anthology Title.  Ed. Editor’s Name(s). Place: Press, Year.  Page Numbers.]

4) A Book: Dolan, Frances E. Dangerous Familiars: Representations of Domestic Crime in England, 1550-1700.  Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1994. [Give: Author’s Name.  Title.  Place: Press, Year.

Jan Stirm's Homepage

 

 

UW-Eau Claire Homepage