![]()
![]()
White*Perception of the Percentage of Major Racial
Groups
What do you think? Write down
the
percentages for both, then check the
numbers by clicking on the ? mark!
| Group | % Perceived* | % Actual | *Ironically, Blacks over estimate their own populations as well! [Harper's Index, May 1996] Black viewers watch 50 percent more TV than any other group. [The Progressive, February 1997, 39] |
| Blacks | |||
| Hispanics | |||
| Asians | |||
| Whites | |||
Source: New York Times, Monday, March 25, 1996, p. A19. | |||
In professional sports,
African Americans comprise 80 % of all players in basketball;
67 % in football; 18 % in baseball. Only 29 % of
poor in the USA are black;
yet in national news magazines, such as Time and Newsweek,
62 % of the pictures associated with stories about poverty
feature
black people; and on TV evening news, it is 65
%. On average, for every $1.00 whites
spend on lottery tickets, blacks spend $5.00. [Source: Harper's
Index]



![]()
![]()




Source: Census of Population, Money Income in the United States: 2000. Optional: get more 2000 census data.
Assimilation of Racial
Groups
Immigrants have always taken time to move into the mainstream, both geographically and culturally. And assimilation has always been a two-way process, with each new wave of immigrants contributing something to what it means to be American, from Jewish humor to German beer. The proper measure of assimilation is not whether racial groups have cut their ties to their homeland completely, but whether they have put down roots in the United States.
Gregory Rodriguez at the New American Foundation argues that if you look
at the four most important measures of "roots" -- 1) citizenship, 2) home ownership, 3)
language-acquisition, and 4) intermarriage -- then
assimilation is going on much as it always has.
1) American citizenship has never been an
automatic choice for immigrants: only about half of
the people who arrived in the United States at the turn of the
century chose to become
citizens. In 1990, 40% of immigrants were naturalized. But this
proportion is likely to rise.
The longer immigrants stay in the United States, the more likely
they are to become citizens:
only 23% of those who arrived in the early 1980s were naturalized
by 1990, compared with
41% of those who arrived in the late 1970s. And the recent
anti-immigrant campaigns in
California and Congress have, paradoxically, inspired the greatest
rush to naturalization in the
history of the country. In 1996, there was a 212% increase over
the previous year in the
number of Mexican immigrants who became citizens.
2) Home ownership is another powerful symbol
of attachment to American life. Half of all
immigrant homes were owner-occupied in 1990. This is a much
lower figure than the one for
native-born Americans. But the longer immigrants stay in the
country, the more likely they
are to join the home-owning classes. In 1996, 75% of immigrants
who had been in the
United States for at least 25 years owned their own homes, compared
with 70% of
native-born Americans.
3) The figures for intermarriage and language-acquisition
are equally heartening from an
assimilationist point of view. By the third generation, a third
or more of Latino and Asian
women are marrying outside their racial groups (see chart
above).
4) In 1900, a quarter of immigrants
could not speak English; in 1990, the figure was only 8%. More
than three-quarters (76%) of
immigrants spoke English "with high proficiency" within ten
years of arriving; and almost all
their children spoke English either well or exclusively. Almost
half the children of Asian
immigrants can speak only English.
Source: "From Newcomers to Americans: The Successful Integration of Immigrants into American Society" (National Immigration Forum, 220 I St NE, Washington, DC, 20002) cited in The Economist, 3 July 1999. p. 24.
|
|