|
|
![]() |
Boreal refers to the ecosystems in the northern parts of Northern
Hemisphere which have subarctic and continental climates (long, cold, snowy winters;
short, hot, humid summers) and tundra and taiga vegetation (stunted larch and
birch, aspen; needleleaf evergreen
trees, such as pine and spruce; and mosses and lichens) in which fur-bearing
animals (minks, muskrats, beaver, fox, bear, etc.) and deer live. The
boreal forests comprise 1/3 of the earth's wooded lands.
Half of the boreal forest is in Russia, while Canada has 1/3, and Alaska and
Scandinavia the rest. Examine this map:
dark green=existing
forests; brown=under
threat from logging, mining, road building, hydro-electric projects [Source:
NGS, June 2002]. These forests are less diverse than tropical
forests: Canada has 3,270 plant species compared with Indonesia's 29,375. Riverine is the adjective for river. Trading stations were established initially for profitable fur trading; only much later did the control of land became important in the settler empire phase. Spatial Patterns: colonies were established along river systems; the larger and longer the rivers the more valuable the empire, e.g., the French control of the St. Lawrence River. Countries: France, Britain, and Russia only created such empires. The U.S. government continued the fur trade for a short time after they seized control of land from the British. |
Officers
from the Grenadier Guards parade
with their colors during the Changing of
the Guard at Buckingham Palace, London, United Kingdom.
A similar
parade occurs in the capital of Canada, Ottawa. How are these
two countries related to each other? Notice what the soldiers are wearing on their heads. Photo: © Sergeant Ian Liptrot, HQ London
District.
Economics: Private European traders and commercial companies served
as agents
of national governments who interacted with local people for only a few goods,
essentially furs and hides (from deer).
For 300 years (1540s-1840s) beavers were used to make felt hats. |
|
|
|
|
| The result: spatially contiguous, rather then fragmented, following riverine systems with largely economically monopolistic economies, rather than competitive economies as the sea empires were. | |
| Option reading: Shepard Krech III, The Ecological Indian: Myth and History. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1999, Chapter 7, Beaver. | |
|
Created by Ingolf Vogeler on 1 February 1996; last revised on 111/05/08. |
|