Social Darwinism
In 19th-century textile mills of
New England,
bosses required their "hands" to stand at a loom from dawn to dusk
and then claimed these long hours were actually beneficial. By
making possible greater leisure time, shorter hours would, they
reasoned, leave their employees more susceptible to corrupting
influences.
Such later capitalists as
George Pullman,
the railway tycoon in the city of
Pullman,
on the Southside of Chicago, also claimed pious intent when they
established model towns that prohibited alcohol and prostitution and
imposed a curfew. Not all workers were grateful. One protested: “We
are born in a Pullman house, fed from the Pullman shop, taught in
the Pullman school, catechized in the Pullman church, and when we
die we shall be buried in the Pullman cemetery and go to the Pullman
hell.”
The r obber
barons
made no claim to paternalism. As fervent converts to
Social Darwinism,
they believed that inequalities were inevitable; that the well-off
deserved their station in life as the poor deserved theirs. Jay
Gould, the greatest railway financier of his day and an ardent
advocate of this dogma, bragged: “I can hire half the working class
to shoot the other half.” |
|
|
The colonized mind
American media
conglomerates like Disney and Time-Warner, publishing giants like Germanys
Bertelsmann and Australias Rupert Murdoch have near-monopoly control of global news
and entertainment. Not just the hardware and the wires but also, increasingly, the
content. The result is Western (mainly American) domination of most forms of popular
culture, especially books, music, movies, television and film.
Does this mean that sooner or later well all be American? Probably
not. But it does mean that local communities are less able to identify and nurture their
own dreams and create their own self-identity through a common project of shared
imagination. Centuries of tradition are eroded by the technically dazzling but
culturally-biased products of the corporate entertainment industry. Goodbye to Hindu
classics like the Ramayana and the age-old folk tales of Africa, hello Baywatch and
Geraldo.
Death of diversity
Cultural diversity mirrors the biological and geographical diversity of our planet.
Disneyfication, like economic globalization, tends to ride roughshod over
local variety. So baseball hats, blue jeans and running shoes become the uniform of
teenagers in both Budapest and Bangalore while Western TV shows promote the illusion of
limitless wealth. This process is not the same as different artistic traditions learning
from each other and sharing ideas freely. Cross-fertilization and borrowing from other
cultures has invigorated and strengthened both Western and Third World arts. Think of
Gauguin in Tahiti or the jazz-influenced sounds of Ghanaian high-life music. Great art
prospers from contact with the outside world. But corporate culture is different: its
guiding principles are efficiency and profit and there is a tendency for those goals to
steamroller both diversity and authenticity.
Market Culture
Cultural uniformity goes hand-in-glove with the cheer-leading for free markets heard in
agencies like the World Trade Organization and the International Monetary Fund. Efforts to
open borders to cultural exports have been at the heart of free-trade
negotiations. Western countries like France and Canada and Third World nations like
Malaysia have fought hard to restrict imports of foreign films, books and magazines to
protect their own heritage. And cultural nationalists everywhere are concerned that
international trade agreements like the Multilateral Treaty on Investment (MAI) would
catalyze the Americanization of global culture. If passed, the MAI would limit the ability
of national governments to impose domestic content standards.
Born to shop
The spread of American movies, music and fashion is as much about buying as culture. In
fact the fusion of consumerism with the arts, entertainment and sport is now widespread.
Olympians are sponsored by Nike, jazz festivals are funded by tobacco companies and rock
singers strike marketing deals with soft-drink firms. Disney and his corporate cohorts
(Reebok, McDonalds, KFC, Coke, Armani, Hilfiger et al) are the shock troops for the
spread of consumer society. They prime the pump for the endless stream of
wants created by corporate hucksters. You can take your kids to see the newest
Disney animated film, Mulan, and then you can buy the video, the key chain, the stuffed
toy, the sweatshirt, the embossed note pad and pencil set. Every Disney animated film
comes bundled with a complete marketing strategy for merchandise, interactive games and a
line of childrens books.
Nature under control
The rise of a corporate monoculture accelerates our separation from the natural world.
Concern for the destruction of the environment becomes a sales opportunity for
slick PR pitch-men while the promotion of frivolous consumer goods continues the assault
of industrial production on the earths finite resources. Despite attempts to pass
itself off as a good corporate citizen, the Disney view of nature generally reflects the
view that all environmental problems can be overcome by technology and human ingenuity.
Sound familiar? It should. Its the same conceit that animates industrial society in
general and the main reason catastrophe threatens the natural world today.
Theme park Earth
Disneys
theme parks in Florida, California, Tokyo and Paris were the first and most successful
attempts to meld entertainment with consumerism. They are fantasy worlds cut off from the
anxieties and fears of daily life where you can temporarily escape the rat
race to join Mickey, Donald and Goofy in a clean and carefree land of the
imagination. We all need to escape the stress of daily life from time to time. But the
Disney theme park idea has metastasized and in the process its become a dominant
model for both urban and commercial development. Chain eateries, mega shopping malls,
redeveloped city centres: all feature the same mix of escapism and consumerism. In the
process the values of the market elbow aside the democratic aspirations of civil society.
As the public realm shrinks we risk turning the Earth and our unique communities into one
big, privatized theme park.
Source: The New Internationalist
|